Preamble
The
New Zealand Press Council was established in 1972 by
newspaper publishers and journalists to provide the
public with an independent forum for resolution of complaints
against the press. It also has other important Objectives
as stated in the Constitution of the Press Council.
Complaint resolution is its core work, but promotion
of freedom of the press and maintenance of the press
in accordance with the highest professional standards
rank equally with that first Objective.
There
are some broad principles to which the Council is committed.
There is no more important principle than freedom of
expression. In a democratically governed society the
public has a right to be informed, and much of that
information comes from the media. Individuals also have
rights and sometimes they must be balanced against competing
interests such as the public's right to know. Freedom
of expression and freedom of the media are inextricably
bound. The print media is jealous in guarding freedom
of expression not just for publishers' sake, but, more
importantly, in the public interest. In complaint resolution
by the Council freedom of expression and public interest
will play dominant roles.
It
is important to the Council that the distinction between
fact, and conjecture, opinions or comment be maintained.
This Principle does not interfere with rigorous analysis,
of which there is an increasing need. It is the hallmark
of good journalism.
The
Council seeks the co-operation of editors and publishers
in adherence to these Principles and disposing of complaints.
The Press Council does not prescribe rules by which
publications should conduct themselves. Editors have
the ultimate responsibility to their proprietors for
what appears editorially in their publications, and
to their readers and the public for adherence to the
standards of ethical journalism which the Council upholds
in this Statement of Principles.
These
Principles are not a rigid code, but may be used by
complainants should they wish to point the Council more
precisely to the nature of their complaint. A complainant
may use other words, or expressions, in a complaint,
and nominate grounds not expressly stated in these Principles.
Next
Page >>
|